7 years have led up to this #ChilcotReport pic.twitter.com/8SDFbQOxuX
— Polly Boiko (@Polly_Boiko) 2016年7月6日
‘Military action was not a last resort’: Chilcot finally releases Iraq War report — RT UK
Britain chose to join the invasion of Iraq in 2003 before peaceful options for disarmament had been exhausted, the Chilcot Inquiry has found. Sir John Chilcot’s seven-year inquiry concluded that military action “was not a last resort.”
The massively delayed and hugely controversial Chilcot Inquiry, reporting back on Wednesday, was tasked with examining the first eight years of the war, starting with the run-up to hostilities and including the period of occupation.
The report’s main focus is on what commitments then-Prime Minister Tony Blair gave to then-US President George W Bush ahead of the invasion, and whether the former PM misled the British public over the threat posed by weapons of mass destruction (WMD), which turned out to be non-existent.
Others in line for criticism include spy agency MI6 for providing inaccurate intelligence, and military commanders for failing to stand up to Blair.
Speaking on the findings of the report, Sir John Chilcot says the severity of the threat posed by Iraq’s WMDs was “presented with a certainty that was not justified.”
He says “despite explicit warnings, the consequences of the invasion were underestimated,” and the planning for Iraq after Saddam Hussein was “wholly inadequate.”
Chilcot says the government “failed to achieve its stated objectives.”
After the attacks in New York on September 11, 2001, Blair urged Bush not to take hasty action on Iraq, Chilcot says.
But by early December, US policy had begun to shift and Blair suggested the US and the UK should work together on what he described as a “clever strategy” for regime change in Iraq, which would “build over time.”
When Blair met Bush in Texas in April 2002, the formal policy was still to contain Saddam. But by then there had been a profound change in the UK’s thinking, Chilcot says.
“The Joint Intelligence Committee had concluded that Saddam Hussein could not be removed without an invasion.
“The government was stating that Iraq was a threat that had to be dealt with. It had to disarm or be disarmed.”
Britain’s formal decision to invade Iraq, if Saddam did not accept the US ultimatum to leave within 48 hours, was taken by the Cabinet on March 17, 2003. Parliament voted the following day to support the decision.
On Wednesday, thousands of anti-war supporters staged a demonstration in Westminster, demanding “truth and justice” and calling for Blair and others to face the full force of the law.
Kate Hudson, protest organiser and CND general secretary says: “The Iraq War was a disaster, a disaster that began with a lie.
“If Tony Blair and other politicians responsible had told the truth it would never have happened. A country was destroyed, millions of innocent Iraqis were killed, British soldiers were killed, and terrorism has spread across the Middle East. Those responsible must now be brought to justice.”
Current Labour Party leader Jeremy Corbyn will respond to the report in Parliament during prime minister’s questions on Wednesday.
He is understood to have concluded that international laws are neither strong nor clear enough to make any war crimes prosecution a reality, and is expected to fulfill a campaign promise to apologize on behalf of the Labour Party for the war.
Alex Salmond, the former Scottish National Party (SNP) leader, has called for the impeachment of Blair and argues that the findings of the report, even if it fails to declare the war illegal, could open the way for legal action.
Blair is planning to hold a press conference on Wednesday to deliver a response to the findings.
It is expected he will insist the Shia-Sunni split in Iraq, one of the driving forces of the continuing violence, preceded the invasion and was not the result of the disruption created by the war.
The Chilcot report runs to 12 volumes totalling 2.6 million words. It was supposed to take two years to complete, but took seven.
英「イラク調査委員会」のジョン・チルコット委員長が6日、7年かけてまとめた報告書を発表しました。→ https://t.co/CrAxPDgkbJ
— BBC News Japan (@bbcnewsjapan) 2016年7月6日
→ 260万語におよぶ報告書は、イラク戦争参戦を決めたブレア首相など当時の政府関係者が国際法に触れたかには言及しないものの、不十分な情報にもとづく介入は「ひどい展開」になり、侵攻の影響は過小評価されていたと批判。→
— BBC News Japan (@bbcnewsjapan) 2016年7月6日
→ チルコット報告書は、2003年2月当時はフセイン政権による脅威がそこまで切迫していたわけではなく、武装解除のための外交手段が尽きていたわけでも、武力行使に頼るしかなかったわけでもないと断じています(英語記事)https://t.co/CyHyvTohx5
— BBC News Japan (@bbcnewsjapan) 2016年7月6日
英イラク調査委報告書を受けてキャメロン首相は下院で演説し、イラク戦争で死亡した英国兵の「犠牲を忘れない」、「教訓を必ず学ぶ」、「戦争は常に最後の手段でなくてはならない」などと述べています(英語記事) https://t.co/zjBLCE45V5
— BBC News Japan (@bbcnewsjapan) 2016年7月6日
英イラク調査委報告書の公表を受けて、野党・労働党のコービン党首は下院で演説し、イラク戦争は「事実と異なる前提を元に始められた軍事侵略だった」、「この下院は開戦に至るまでミスリードされた」などと述べました(英語記事) https://t.co/hBSGAlXuD2
— BBC News Japan (@bbcnewsjapan) 2016年7月6日
英イラク調査委の報告書公表を受けて、ブレア元英首相が会見中です。参戦は首相として最も困難な判断で「嘘はついていないが」批判は全て受け入れると。情報が誤っており「決して分かってもらえないほどの悲しみと遺憾の意と謝罪を表明したい」とも→ https://t.co/Pde43bKfeg
— BBC News Japan (@bbcnewsjapan) 2016年7月6日
→ブレア元首相は、9/11後に英国を守ろうと必死だったと強調し、サダム・フセインをあのままにしておいた方が世界にとって良かったという説には、真っ向から反対すると力説しました。
— BBC News Japan (@bbcnewsjapan) 2016年7月6日
"I accept full responsibility... without exception, and without excuse" Tony Blair #Chilcothttps://t.co/lOjx5zJlK8 https://t.co/T8TCkS3287
— BBC Breaking News (@BBCBreaking) 2016年7月6日
WATCH LIVE: Blair speaks on #Chilcot Report https://t.co/4zRqCOFeo3 pic.twitter.com/aHMBiAzect
— RT (@RT_com) 2016年7月6日
→元首相は、振り返ってみればイラク復興をもっと周到に用意すべきだったが、2003年3月の時点で「正しい決断をしたと信じているし、世界はその結果、より良い、より安全な場所になった」、「嘘はついていない、国をミスリードしていない」などと強調しました。
— BBC News Japan (@bbcnewsjapan) 2016年7月6日
@bbcnewsjapan ブレア英元首相は、自分が謝罪するのは計画段階や情報の誤り、遂行上の不手際についてであって、米国と共にフセイン政権下のイラク攻撃に参加するという当時の決断について謝罪するのではないと言明しました。
— BBC News Japan (@bbcnewsjapan) 2016年7月6日
BBCニュース<動画> - 「サダムがいない方が世界にとって良い」 ブレア元英首相 https://t.co/2FBkTiOa46 pic.twitter.com/IOyzsDM9GA
— BBC News Japan (@bbcnewsjapan) 2016年7月7日
This is all 12 tomes of the #Chilcot Inquiry report. pic.twitter.com/5YmQSsmB7c
— Polly Boiko (@Polly_Boiko) 2016年7月6日